Health Promotion & Role Development in Adv. Nursing Practice-DAX-DL01 Nora Hernandez-Pupo Health Promotion Proposal, Part 2 Health Promotion Proposal, Part 2  This is a con

Health Promotion & Role Development in Adv. Nursing Practice-DAX-DL01 Nora Hernandez-Pupo

Health Promotion Proposal, Part 2

Health Promotion Proposal, Part 2

 This is a continuation of the health promotion program proposal, part one, which you submitted previously. 

 Please approach this assignment as an opportunity to integrate instructor feedback from part I and expand on ideas adhering to the components of the MAP-IT strategy. Include necessary levels of detail you feel appropriate to assure stakeholder buy-in.

 Directions 

You have already completed the steps 1-4. Do not resubmit part 1. Make sure you incorporate any suggested revisions or improvements into your submission according to your instructor’s comments. 

 To assist in maintaining harmony between Part I and 2 here you have a reminder of the previous paper outline:

• 1. Describe the health problem. Using data and statistics support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem. What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program? Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. 
• 2. Describe the vulnerable population and setting. What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified. 
• 3. Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals on evidence-based interventions that address the problem. After completing a library search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, you will write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found. You might consult research texts for information on how to write a review of the literature found in your search. 
• 4. Select an appropriate health promotion/disease prevention theoretical framework or conceptual model that would best serve as the framework guiding the proposal. Provide a rationale for your selection which includes a discussion of the concepts of the selected model 

 

For this assignment develop criteria 5-8 as detailed below: 

You will submit just this section 5-8 as an essay. Please do not resubmit Part 1. 

 

Use a presentation page. Start the body of content with topic 5.

• 5. Propose a health promotion program using an evidence-based intervention found in your literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting. Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which includes resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role. 
• Be certain to include a timeline. (3 to 4 paragraphs- you may use bullets if appropriate). 
• 6. Thoroughly describe the intended outcomes. Describe the outcomes in detail concurrent with the SMART goal approach. The SMART goal statement should be no more than one sentence (1 paragraph). 
• 7. Provide a detailed plan for the evaluation of each outcome. (2-3 paragraphs). 
• 8. Thoroughly describe possible barriers/challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/challenges. (2+ paragraphs). 
• Finish the paper with a conclusion paragraph (2 paragraphs) without typing the word “conclusion” before the paragraph. 

 

Paper Requirements 

This assignment is to be submitted as an essay- with an introduction, questions developed at the graduate level, and a conclusion to summarize and synthesize key points. Remember, your Proposal must be a scholarly paper demonstrating graduate school-level writing and critical analysis of existing nursing knowledge about health promotion.

 

APA must be strictly followed.

Your final assignment should be minimally 5 pages (excluding title page and references). 

Finish the essay with your reference page.

 

Please review the Grading Rubric for this Assignment.

REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.

Great resource to assist you: Reference List: Author/Authors – Purdue OWL® – Purdue University

Submission

Text Editor

 

Word count: 0

Details & Information

• Integration of Knowledge

25% of total result

Excellent

The paper demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas. All questions are answered thoroughly.

25

Satisfactory

The paper demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper. Questions were not fully developed but concepts are explained well.

20

Unsatisfactory

The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. There is a lack of development of questions.

15

Unacceptable

The paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course. Cursory integration of knowledge and development of questions.

10

• Topic Focus

25% of total result

Excellent

The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis. The topic is consistently well thought out, thorough offers insight into the topic, and includes cited evidence to support the topic.

25

Satisfactory

The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic, but the writer has not established a position. The topic is somewhat well thought out, offers limited insight into the topic, but does not include cited evidence to support the topic.

20

Unsatisfactory

The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.

15

Unacceptable

The topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.

10

• Depth of Discussion and Cohesiveness

25% of total result

Excellent

In-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper. Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next with no headings. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. There is an introduction and a conclusion in the submission.

25

Satisfactory

In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper. Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and a conclusion in the submission.

20

Unsatisfactory

The writer has omitted content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively. Sometimes ties together information from all sources. The paper does not flow. Disjointedness is apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and/or conclusion in the submission, but not both.

15

Unacceptable

Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections It does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate an understanding of any relationship. There is NO introduction or conclusion in the submission.

10

• Sources : reference complete with DOI numbers.

8% of total result

Excellent

At least 6 current sources are used and are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All websites utilized are authoritative. All references complete without DOI number.

8

Satisfactory

Used 5 current sources, which are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are authoritative. 1 reference incomplete without DOI number.

6.4

Unsatisfactory

Used 4 current sources which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are credible. 2 references incomplete without DOI number.

4.8

Unacceptable

Fewer than 4 current sources are used which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all websites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current. More than 2 references incomplete without DOI number.

3.2

• APA adherence and Citation in text

5% of total result

Excellent

Fewer than 5 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors. APA level headings incorporated throughout the submission.

5

Satisfactory

More than 5 but fewer than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors. No headings incorporated other than the title heading.

4

Unsatisfactory

More than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, or APA format errors. No headings incorporated other than the title heading.

3

Unacceptable

The citation style is inconsistent or incorrect. It does not cite sources. The paper submitted is NOT in APA Format. No headings incorporated other than the title heading.

2

• Spelling and Grammar

12% of total result

Excellent

Fewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors The required word count has been met.

12

Satisfactory

More than 5 but fewer than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word count is 25 words below the minimum required count.

9.6

Unsatisfactory

More than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word count is 50 words below the minimum required count.

7.2

Unacceptable

An unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. The required word count is more than 50 words below the minimum required count.