Course Name: Foundations of Reflective Practice in Nursing
Assessment Type: Individual Reflective Essay
Word Limit: 1,500 words (excluding references)
Weighting: 40%
Due Date: Week 8, Friday 5:00 PM (submit via LMS)
Learning Outcomes Assessed: LO2: Apply reflective models to analyse clinical experiences; LO3: Demonstrate self-awareness in professional nursing practice.
Reflect on a specific clinical experience from your recent placement or simulation using Driscoll’s Model of Reflection (2007). This three-stage model—what?, so what?, now what?—helps you systematically examine your actions, feelings, and future improvements in nursing practice. Choose an incident involving patient care, teamwork, or ethical decision-making. Structure your essay to address each stage explicitly, drawing on nursing theory and evidence to support your analysis.
Incorporate at least 8 scholarly references (APA 7th edition). Use first-person voice. Maintain confidentiality using pseudonyms.
| Criteria | High Distinction (85-100%) | Distinction (75-84%) | Credit (65-74%) | Pass (50-64%) | Fail (<50%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Description of Experience (What?) | Clear, detailed, contextualised account with precise actions and context. | Detailed description with good context. | Adequate description but lacks depth. | Basic outline; omits key details. | Vague or absent. |
| Analysis of Feelings/Responses (So What?) | Deep insight into emotions, influences, and theoretical links. | Good analysis with some theory. | Surface-level analysis. | Minimal emotional reflection. | No analysis. |
| Action Plan (Now What?) | Specific, evidence-based strategies for improvement. | Clear future actions linked to learning. | General plans identified. | Vague intentions. | No plan. |
| Structure, Scholarship, Writing | Exemplary APA, flawless writing, seamless flow. | Strong adherence, minor errors. | Mostly correct, some issues. | Frequent errors affect readability. | Poor structure and referencing. |
During my placement in the emergency department, I assisted in caring for a 65-year-old patient admitted with chest pain. I took vital signs and prepared an IV line while the team assessed for myocardial infarction. My role involved monitoring oxygen saturation, which dropped to 92%, prompting me to alert the nurse. Another student nurse was present, observing quietly. The experience felt intense yet rewarding as we stabilised the patient quickly.
In that moment, anxiety gripped me because I worried my inexperience might delay care. I responded by double-checking readings and communicating promptly, driven by my prior simulation training. Reflecting now, I feel more confident, though initially my actions clashed with my fear of errors. The senior nurse appeared calm and praised my initiative, which validated my efforts and highlighted teamwork’s role.
This reflection reveals gaps in my confidence under pressure, which better communication protocols could address. Next time, I would verbalise concerns earlier to involve the team sooner. To prepare, I plan to review advanced cardiac assessments and seek mentorship. What went wrong before was hesitation; now, I commit to assertive practice (Driscoll, J. (2007). Practising clinical supervision: A reflective approach for healthcare professionals. Elsevier).
A 2022 study in the Journal of Advanced Nursing examined Driscoll’s model in acute care settings, finding it improved nurses’ emotional regulation by 25% after repeated use. Participants in a UK hospital trial reported clearer identification of bias in high-stress scenarios, such as the one described. This aligns with my experience, where initial anxiety clouded judgment until debriefed.
Students often overlook linking reflections to regulatory standards like the Nursing and Midwifery Council’s code, assuming personal insight suffices. Compare Driscoll’s simplicity to Gibbs’ six-stage cycle, which adds evaluation but demands more time—ideal for complex cases yet less practical in fast-paced placements. In Australia, NMBA guidelines emphasise such reflections for registration, so integrate them explicitly to meet competencies.
Course Code: NURS2005 | Due: Week 11 | Word Limit: 2,000 words | Weight: 30%.
Analyse a provided case study on patient handover errors using Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle (1988). Describe the situation, evaluate outcomes, and propose multidisciplinary improvements. Include 10 references, focus on safety protocols, and peer-review simulation data. Rubric emphasises critical analysis and NMBA standards alignment.
Week 10 Discussion Post: Post 400 words on “Compare Driscoll and Kolb models in nursing education” with two peer replies (150 words each).
Assessment Task 4 (Week 13): 2,500-word portfolio of three reflections from placements, using multiple models.
Final Benchmark: 3,000-word research essay on “Efficacy of reflective models in reducing nursing errors,” with meta-analysis.
Why Work with Us
Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers
We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.
Professional and Experienced Academic Writers
We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.
Free Unlimited Revisions
If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.
Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee
All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.
Original & Confidential
We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.
24/7 Customer Support
Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.
Try it now!
How it works?
Follow these simple steps to get your paper done
Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Receive the final file
Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.
Our Services
No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.
Essays
No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.
Admissions
Admission Essays & Business Writing Help
An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.
Reviews
Editing Support
Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.
Reviews
Revision Support
If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.