The project plan has word limit of 2,000 and should be supported with recent literature. The reference list is not included in the word count. In-text citations will be included in the word count. If you exceed the word limit by more

Weight:

35%

Type of Collaboration:

Individual

Due:

Monday 14th September 2026,
23:59 hrs

Submission:

Submission via Turnitin in
ULTRA

Format:

Project Plan

Length:

2,000 words

Use of Artificial Intelligence:

In this assessment task, you will not be able to meet the
learning outcomes related to this assessment by using generative artificial
intelligence (AI) tools. Working with another person or technology in order
to gain an unfair advantage in assessment or improperly obtaining answers
from a third party including generative AI to questions in an examination or
other form of assessment may lead to sanctions under the Student Misconduct
Rule. Use
of generative AI tools may be detected. More information is available on the Library Webpage.

Criteria

High Distinction

Distinction

Credit

Pass

Unsatisfactory

Introduction,

Background,
Aims,

Objectives,

Outcomes, Plan (30)

Exceptionally appropriate, clear, and concise
framing of the project statement and describes the scope of the project.

Included  SMART

innovative
goals- each goal is clearly explained.(30-25.5)

Very good, clear, and concise framing of the project, describes
the scope of the project.

Included SMART goals that are innovative – each goal
is explained in detail.

(25-22.5)

Good
framing of the project statement and describes the scope of the project to some
extent.

Included SMART

goals  and each goal is
explained in detail.

(22-19.5)

Identifies the project statement and states the
scope of the

project.
Included SMART goals and each goal is explained. (19-15)

The
project plan and scope is vague, unclear or poorly
written. Inadequate, absence or poor use of the SMART goals. Lack of
explanation of each goal. (≤ 14.5)

Methods,

Interventions,
Steps,

Justifications,

Resources (30)

Exceptionally logical,

comprehensive, and coherent description of work
breakdown, resources required. Exceptionally thoughtful and realistic
timeline incorporates all necessary tasks for project completion.

(30-25.5)

Superior

explanation of work breakdown, resources required
and risk management plan. Provides relevant and realistic timeline for
project completion. (25-22.5)

Adequate explanation of work breakdown, resources
required and risk management plan. Realistic timeline for project completion.
(22-19.5)

Good explanation of work breakdown, resources
required and risk management plan. Realistic timeline for project completion.

(19-15)

Poor explanation of work breakdown, resources
required and risk management plan. Poor identification of timeline for
project completion.

(≤14.5)

Timeline,
Risk

Management

Plan, reflection and Framework

.(30)

Comprehensive

description of the risk management plan, timeline, design
or framework that is being used for this project with a clear reflection
and description on how the feedback and framework shaped the
project.(30-25.5)

Deatiled
and coherent description of the risk management plan, timeline,
design or framework that is being used for this project with a clear
reflection and description on how the feedback and framework shaped the project.(25-22.5)

Generally
logical and coherent description of the risk management plan, timeline,
design or framework that is being used for this project with a clear
reflection and description on how the feedback and framework shaped the
project.(22-19.5)

Describes
the
risk management plan, timeline, design or framework that is being used for
this project with a clear reflection and description on how the feedback and
framework shaped the project with gaps and lacking details or unachievable.

(19-15)

Inadequate
description of the risk management plan, timeline, design or framework that
is being used for this project with a clear reflection and description on how
the feedback and framework shaped the project.

(≤14.5)

Academic writing and

referencing skills.(10)

There are no spelling or grammatical errors.
Referencing is accurate and formatted according to the APA 7th Style Guide.

(10-8.5)

There are
1-2 minor spelling or grammatical errors. Referencing is accurate and
formatted according to the APA 7th Style Guide. (8-7.5)

Minimal
spelling or grammatical errors. Referencing is mostly accurate and formatted
according to the APA 7th Style Guide. (7-6.5)

There are
several spelling or grammatical errors. Referencing is mostly accurate and
formatted according to the APA 7th Style Guide. (6-5)

There are
consistent spelling and/or grammatical errors. Referencing is not accurate
and/or not formatted according to the APA 7th Style Guide. (≤4.5)